Mats,
I'm sure that your comments are something we can all agree on.
Secondary gain is that it keeps us consultants in business.
Mark
Mark Sale MD
Next Level Solutions, LLC
www.NextLevelSolns.com
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [NMusers] Minimum patients number and reference to Laputa
> in Gullivers Travels
> From: "Mats Karlsson" <mats.karlsson_at_farmbio.uu.se>
> Date: Sun, January 28, 2007 5:47 pm
> To: "'Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions'" <mark_at_nextlevelsolns.com>
> Cc: <nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com>
>
> Mark,
>
> The best guess of an expert may well be what is most cost-efficient for
> designing a study. However, it needs to be tailored to the particular study
> which requires more information that we have been provided with and more
> effort than we are likely to put in. Therefore, my advice to Ahmed is to get
> someone who is experienced onboard. Don't rely on general advice on a
> listserv for designing your trial if you don't have the expertise yourself.
>
> BTW As you mention it, I think that the rule about etas can be particularly
> misleading and I can't really see what basis it has. With dense data, the
> number of subjects will influence the number of etas for which an estimate
> can be obtained in manner that is far from linear (which the rule implies).
> It will of course be related to the precision with which a variance will be
> estimated, but that's not the question.
>
> Mats
>
>
>
>
> Mats Karlsson, PhD
> Professor of Pharmacometrics
> Div. of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Therapy
> Dept. of Pharmaceutical Biosciences
> Faculty of Pharmacy
> Uppsala University
> Box 591
> SE-751 24 Uppsala
> Sweden
> phone +46 18 471 4105
> fax +46 18 471 4003
> mats.karlsson_at_farmbio.uu.se
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com] On
> Behalf Of Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions
> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 22:27
> Cc: nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com
> Subject: [NMusers] Minimum patients number and reference to Laputa in
> Gullivers Travels
>
> Mats,
> These "rules of thumb" are exactly as you suspect, a well intentioned
> best guess. But, lacking other answers, (and for all this discussion,
> I don't recall another answer to the question, with the exception of
> Serge, who suggests a simulation based method). It isn't clear to me
> that an answer based in experience, admitted incomplete, is more likely
> to lead in the wrong direction than no answer at all. I have found the
> academic discussion from people smarter than I am very interesting,
> just haven't seen an answer to the question (again, except perhaps from
> Serge who I agree with, that simulation is the best way to answer the
> question or how many. Optimal design is probably a very good, and as
> Steve points out a very fast, way to answer when).
> Experience also suggests that practical matters drive sample size as
> much as theoretical
> > > Minimum 10 patients per eta would mean 50-60 patients.
> > > I'm sure this number would give optimal results but as
> > > a matter of fact I don't think I would be able to
> > > reach it.
>
> At which point, we need the academics to try to rescue an underpowered
> study.
>
>
>
>
> Mark Sale MD
> Next Level Solutions, LLC
> www.NextLevelSolns.com
>
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: RE: [NMusers] Minimum patients number...
> > From: "Mats Karlsson" <mats.karlsson_at_farmbio.uu.se>
> > Date: Sun, January 28, 2007 3:49 pm
> > To: "'Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions'" <mark_at_nextlevelsolns.com>
> > Cc: <nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com>
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > Although I realize that the rules of thumb are well-intended ways to help
> > less experienced along, the data requirements are so situation-dependent
> > that any such general rule is likely to guide in the wrong direction more
> > often than not.
> >
> > If indeed the "empiric observations" you refer to is from a database
> > collected and analyzed for the purpose of coming up with these rules, it
> > would be interesting to learn more about it. Otherwise, I guess it is like
> > most rules of thumb that we try to formulate - just a best guess by an
> > experienced analyst.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Mats
> >
> >
> > Mats Karlsson, PhD
> > Professor of Pharmacometrics
> > Div. of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Therapy
> > Dept. of Pharmaceutical Biosciences
> > Faculty of Pharmacy
> > Uppsala University
> > Box 591
> > SE-751 24 Uppsala
> > Sweden
> > phone +46 18 471 4105
> > fax +46 18 471 4003
> > mats.karlsson_at_farmbio.uu.se
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com]
> On
> > Behalf Of Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions
> > Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 20:50
> > Cc: nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com
> > Subject: RE: [NMusers] Minimum patients number...
> >
> > Mats,
> > The "rules of thumb" are indeed empiric observations from one
> > variable. But, if you have two dependent variables, you have twice the
> > data (one time point, two DVs), and twice the parameters. So, I think
> > the rule may be consistent, but I don't know how valuable it is in the
> > first place.
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark Sale MD
> > Next Level Solutions, LLC
> > www.NextLevelSolns.com
> >
> >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: RE: [NMusers] Minimum patients number...
> > > From: "Mats Karlsson" <mats.karlsson_at_farmbio.uu.se>
> > > Date: Sat, January 27, 2007 11:41 am
> > > To: "'Ahmed Hawwa'" <ahawwa1_at_yahoo.com>, <nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I think that all the rules of thumb that have been mentioned are based
> on
> > > the assumption that you have a single observed variable. If you observe
> > > several, you certainly can expect to estimate more parameterers.
> > >
> > > Mvh,
> > > Mats
> > >
> > >
> > > Mats Karlsson, PhD
> > > Professor of Pharmacometrics
> > > Div. of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Therapy
> > > Dept. of Pharmaceutical Biosciences
> > > Faculty of Pharmacy
> > > Uppsala University
> > > Box 591
> > > SE-751 24 Uppsala
> > > Sweden
> > > phone +46 18 471 4105
> > > fax +46 18 471 4003
> > > mats.karlsson_at_farmbio.uu.se
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Ahmed Hawwa
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 02:10
> > > To: nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com
> > > Subject: RE: [NMusers] Minimum patients number...
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Thank you all indeed for the valuable commenets. I
> > > have actually 19 patients only and I need to look into
> > > the PK parameters of two metabolites.
> > >
> > > Minimum 10 patients per eta would mean 50-60 patients.
> > > I'm sure this number would give optimal results but as
> > > a matter of fact I don't think I would be able to
> > > reach it.
> > >
> > > > I would suggest that you assess each case on its
> > > > merits and determine the
> > > > effectiveness of any proposed design using either
> > > > simulation linked with
> > > > estimation (which is tedious, slow, not optimal but
> > > > often effective)
> > >
> > > Regarding using simultation do you mean to put certain
> > > values of thetas and then run a simulation and compare
> > > results with the actual concentrations or did I miss
> > > the point?
> > >
> > > > or an
> > > > information theoretic technique (such as optimal
> > > > design).
> > > > The optimal design software WinPOPT
> > > > (www.winpopt.com), which is freely
> > > > available, allows you to rapidly assess the
> > > > effectiveness of various designs
> > > > as well as optimize a design within your specific
> > > > study constraints (e.g.
> > > > clinic visit times etc).
> > >
> > > I think one of my study constrains is clinic visit
> > > times since patients taking our drug are actually
> > > outpatients and we are able to collect one sample only
> > > at each clinic visit. would this software be of any
> > > help??
> > >
> > > Looking to hear from you soon.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > ahawwa
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> > > ________
> > > Cheap talk?
> > > Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
> > > http://voice.yahoo.com
Received on Sun Jan 28 2007 - 18:34:23 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 06 2007 - 15:08:27 EST