Dear Dr. Meineke,
You are correct, if a parameter is too different from the initial
estimate this message will be issued. Also, if a between subject
variance is close to 0 or a between subject covariance yields a
correlation close to 0, -1 or 1, then this message may be issued. With
this knowledge, it is usually easy to identify the offending parameter
estimate(s). This is a new "feature" that Stuart Beal added to NONMEM
VI. Some users have had positive comments ! while others what to
suppress
it. To suppress this message for most situations change the statement
DATA INCR/1E-02/ found in NONMEM routines (nm directory) named
CN.for,
CN1.for and DECN1.for
to DATA INCR/0/
Delete all *.obj and *.lib files in the nm directory and recompile by
rerunning CDSETUP6 with the original arguments, which can usually be
found in SETUP.TXT, from the NONMEM home directory.
The Introduction to NONMEM VI does alert the user that there are new
error messages but does not provide the details. This response will
be
copied to nmusers so that users are better informed.
Thank you for your message.
Tom Ludden
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [NMusers] How to solve it? ERROR: PARAMETER ESTIMATE IS NEAR
ITS BOUNDARY
From: Jian Xu <alanub@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, July 18, 2007 11:13 am
To: NM Users <nmusers@globomaxnm.com>
Dear NM Users,
Currently, I am running some Pop PK models in NM VI. Sometimes, I hit the following error message:
PARAMETER ESTIMATE IS NEAR ITS BOUNDARY
THIS MUST BE ADDRESSED BEFORE THE COVARIANCE STEP CAN BE IMPLEMENTED.
This error message is self-explained, but when I checked the final parameter estimates, none of which is close to its boundary. Sometimes, if I remove the boundary, it will work, but not always.
Could someone here give some suggestions to help me out? and point out what is the possible reason to cause this error message? I appreciate your input.
Thanks a lot,
Jian
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 06 2007 - 15:06:37 EST