[NMusers] AUC Calculation in Simulation with and without EST
From: Paul Hutson <prhutson_at_pharmacy.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:59:33 -0600
I have data from PO, IP, and SQ(pump) infusions of this compound that I
am modeling using 2-3 samples per mouse (30 critters worth), and the
fits for a 1 cmpt are pretty good. In order to obtain a smooth plot to
compare to the observed data, I have run N=1 simulations for a single
"subject" (ID=1) using the bootstrapped parameters from all animals
(each receiving drug via a single route).
My question for the NMUSERS is this. When I just use $SIM without
$EST, my AUC calculated by F1*AMT/CL is wildly different than the AUC I
obtain by a quick trapezoidal check of my PRED column in the output
file. When I use both $SIM and $EST as shown below, the integrated and
trapezoidal AUCs agree. Why is there a difference? I presume
that it is due to the use of a dummy value of "1" for DV throughout my
initial data file, but I don't understand why. Thanks as always.
(csv file follows ctl)
(As always, any other suggestions to spruce up the code or my approach
is appreciated.) Paul
$PROBLEM CYCLOPAMIDE
$INPUT ID TIME AMT RATE ADDL II PMP DV CMP RTE EVID
$DATA ..\Lipinski_24PO.CSV IGNORE=#
$SIMULATION (1111)