Re: [NMusers] Meta-analysis with Nonmem

From: Guangli Ma <guangli.pmx_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:55:26 +0800

Dear Dirk,

Thanks. Now I understand that it is one observation per individual. The
reason why I mentioned CFB is not to ask how to use it but to show if CFB
can not be derived from simulation, there is no additional benefit.
Your results hightly depend on N, because simulation introduces random
errors for observed SD/SE.

Best regards,
Guangli

Received on Fri Mar 05 2010 - 02:55:26 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Martin Bergstrand: "RE: [NMusers] Meta-analysis with Nonmem"
Previous message: yhb5442387: "[NMusers] How to think about the different determination methods?"
In reply to: Garmann, Dirk: "AW: [NMusers] Meta-analysis with Nonmem"
Next in thread: alindauer-research_at_ferrergrupo.com: "Re: [NMusers] Meta-analysis with Nonmem"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 06 2010 - 03:01:48 EST